Media Redefined;Creativity, Technology and Community
An Article By Bevin Wangari
An Article By Bevin Wangari
Abstract
Stories shape us, but in the digital age, who shapes the stories? Technology has transformed how we create, share, and connect, blurring the lines between innovation and control. While AI and online platforms amplify voices, they also raise tough questions;who owns our narratives, and where do legal boundaries lie? Through Kenyan case law and philosophical insights, I explores the tension between creativity, technology, and regulation. As we navigate this evolving space, one question remains, Are we the storytellers, or are we being written into a script we don’t control?
Aristotle once said "We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit." As a poet and jurist at heart,allow me to summarize it as follows;
Once, beneath the golden glow of lanterns,
stories were whispered, carved in ink,
sealed in scrolls, guarded by scribes,
truth and tale entwined in time.
Then rose the press, the radio’s hum,
cinematic dreams in silver streams.
Voices carried beyond the seas,
yet bound by ink in legal seams.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 19) spoke:
‘Let words be free, let thoughts take flight,
but let them not cast shadow nor blight.’
But today, stories flicker in codes and clicks.
A tweet ignites, a post takes flight,
a poet’s canvas is pixels and scripts.
Yet the Kenyan Constitution (Article 33) reminds:
‘Speak your truth, but guard its weight,
for freedom bends where harm is great.’
A revolution begins with a single post,
yet watchful eyes in silence loom.
The Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act stands,
balancing speech with shields unseen,
for every echo in digital halls,
may also be a whisper traced.
We live in an age where creation is boundless,
yet attention is fleeting, swallowed by scrolls.
Do we shape the medium, or does it shape us?
Is our voice still our own, or an echo of the feed?
As the Data Protection Act guards our shadows,
as AI sculpts new tales untold,
we must ask ;how do we stay true?
How do we keep the soul of the story alive,
when the law and the lens redefine its form?
Socrates once said that, ’The unexamined life is not worth living.’Therefore,we ought to question how technology influences creativity among various creators.
The digital age has transformed creativity, redefining how we tell stories, engage with audiences, and shape communities. From social media to AI-generated art, technology has blurred the lines between creator and consumer. This evolution raises critical questions about authenticity, control, and legal implications.
The role of technology in the digital creation space has seen the rise of digital platforms which have democratized creativity, allowing anyone with an internet connection to share their voice. However, as algorithms dictate visibility and AI tools automate artistic expression, the big question that arises is whether we are still the authors of our own creativity or simply responding to digital trends.In the same spirit,Plato once warned of the power of imitation, arguing in The Republic that art can be deceptive whereby, ‘Poets and painters create mere reflections of reality, shaping perception but not truth’ implying that content creators ought to consider whether their work informs or misleads the public.Personally, I feel like in a world where AI generates paintings, poems, and even legal analyses, this concern grows more pressing. If machines create, do they also think? And if they think, do they dream?Thus, if we let technology dictate our freedom and creativity,we may become prisoners of the very systems we build.Giving credence to Friedrich Nietzsche words that,"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And if you gaze long into the abyss, the abyss also gazes into you."
privacy.
As John Stuart Mill wrote in On Liberty that ‘The worth of a state, in the long run, is the worth of the individuals composing it.’Implying that how we regulate technology today determines the kind of society we build tomorrow.In the same spirit,while digital platforms may empower creativity,laws stand as sentinels ,firm and tall,guarding voices and shaping them all.For instance, the Kenyan Data Protection Act and the Computer Misuse and Cybercrime Act ensure protection from digital exploitation while the Kenyan Copyright Act plays a role in protecting creative work in the digital space. However, with the rise of AI-generated content,the legal system must continuously adapt to new challenges as questions like, ‘Who owns an AI-generated novel?’ need to be answered.
Similarly,in Kenya, various legal decisions have highlighted the judiciary's role in navigating these challenges.For instance, in the High court case of Okoiti v. Communications Authority of Kenya(2023) , the petitioner raised concerns about the government's implementation of a Device Management System (DMS) without adequate public information, potentially infringing on privacy rights.In Kenya Human Rights Commission v. Communications Authority of Kenya(2021)eKLR , The High Court emphasized the importance of safeguarding citizens' privacy rights, ruling that any surveillance measures must be lawful, necessary, and proportionate, while in the Huduma Namba Case(Nubian Rights Forum and others v Attorney general)(2020) –The High Court ruled that implementing Kenya’s digital identity system without an appropriate legal framework violated the constitutional right to privacy.
Beyond legal considerations, the digital space has redefined what it means to be part of a creative community. Online forums, global collaborations, and virtual storytelling have fostered a new sense of interconnectedness. However, in a world driven by fast content and viral moments, creators must be intentional about preserving depth, originality, and cultural integrity in their work.
Socrates warned of the dangers of written knowledge, fearing that writing would weaken the mind’s ability to remember and reason. Today, are we facing a new kind of intellectual erosion—one driven by fleeting digital content rather than reflective thought?
"Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." — Rousseau
Are the chains of today made of algorithms, engagement metrics, and digital dependence?
As content creation shifts to the digital realm, ethical considerations become crucial. The spread of misinformation, and AI-generated propaganda calls for increased media literacy and responsibility. Creators must be aware of the ethical implications of their work, ensuring that innovation does not compromise truth or integrity.
Nietzsche once declared:
‘God is dead. And we have killed him.’In that,in a world where AI can replicate human art, ideas, and even philosophical thought, are we witnessing the death of traditional creativity? Or is this merely the birth of a new kind of artistic evolution?
As we navigate this digital renaissance, the challenge remains in leveraging technology while maintaining the soul of creativity.Laws provide structure but but ethical considerations and personal integrity shape the essence of artistic expression As we embrace innovation,let us also strive to stay authentic .The question still remains, are we shaping technology or is technology shaping us?
HAVE A LOOK AT WANGARI BEVIN'S OTHER WORKS BY CLICKING ME